When
Mr. Bundy made the comments about colored people being better off when
they were slaves, I think that a lot of people misunderstood just what
exactly he was trying to get at.
Long ago, being
colored or Asian, (for that matter) meant that you were restricted by a
society that was prejudiced and which limited your ability to live and
function as a free person. The end result was a form of slavery where a
life 'picking cotton' was often all the life you had. That much of what
Bundy said was merely a statement of historical fact. But then, he
stumbled when he tried to compare the lives of colored people (actually
many minorities) when he said that they were 'better off' in those days
then they frequently are under government sponsored programs that are
tools of enslavement in their own right. He pointed to living conditions
in which a large percentage of families are 'broken' with gang
membership the only form of 'parenting' that now occurs. And yes, it's
true! Their 'government sponsored lifestyle' has resulted in some
startling and troubling facts! For instance, even though colored people
make up just 30% of the general population, they account for 60% of
those imprisoned and 1 in 3 can expect to visit prison sometime within
their lifetimes! I think Bundy contends that figures like those are a
direct result of a broken family structure and a growing dependence on
Federal handouts just for them to survive! And, in that light, slavery
was at least a somewhat 'safer' existence. Sadly, as of today, it's not just the minorities that are becoming more and more 'enslaved' by the New Nanny State - we're fast approaching a statistic showing half the US population on some form of entitlement program...
So,
is Mr. Bundy an extremist? You betcha. But, I also remember a couple
of quotes from President Regan when he said, "Government's first duty is
to protect the people, not run their lives." And, another time when he
correctly forecast that, “Government is not a solution to our problem
government is the problem.”